March 5, 2012 by David Mackenzie
Last year, I wrote an article looking at the pros and cons of letting property for the short term with an eye to maximising rental income from the Olympics. At that time, a year ahead of the Games, I cautioned against trying to ‘cash in’ by highlighting the practicalities involved:
• Potential voids
• High agency fees for short term lets
• High turnover of tenancies (typically 3-4 nights at a time)
• Local authority short–term letting restrictions and licensing
• Leasehold restrictions on short –term lets at apartment buildings
• Potential for a glut of property coming back to the market post-Games
My recommendation was to think very long and hard before turning away from the security of an incumbent long-term tenancy as the pros looked distinctly outweighed by the cons.
But add to this the fact that demand for short term ‘Olympic’ rents is yet to materialise and it seems even more prudent to steer well clear.
Our philosophy is to always look at the big picture and to take a long term view of your property assets and associated returns; after all, property investment isn’t a game.